Tightrope Walking: Balancing Leadership Roles and Partnerships with Undergraduate Student Assistants in SoTL Research

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/isotl876

Keywords:

faculty-student partners, rights-based research practice, Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, student leadership, undergraduate student research assistants

Abstract

In this reflective essay, a researcher relates her experience of supporting partnerships with undergraduate student research assistants (RAs) during a SoTL study. Unexpected changes to the ethics requirements after the study had received approval and commenced resulted in changing the leadership roles of the research team members and adjusting procedures for facilitating interviews with the study participants. Although unsettling at the time, these modifications opened valuable opportunities for the RAs to co-facilitate focus group interviews and hone their leadership and research skills. Reflections on the researcher’s and a student RA’s experiences exemplify the SoTL principles of “respect, reciprocity, and shared responsibility” in supporting student partnerships (Cook-Sather et al., 2014, p. 27). Expanding further by recognizing rights as a principle promotes equal faculty-student research partnerships and acknowledges the knowledge, professional experience, and leadership skills that undergraduate student RAs contribute to SoTL studies and project work.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Carolyn Bjartveit, Mount Royal University

Carolyn Bjartveit, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor and the coordinator of the Bachelor of Child Studies/Early Learning and Child Care degree program at Mount Royal University. She has experience teaching pre-K to post-secondary graduate levels in early childhood education. Her research areas include curriculum studies, cultural studies, history and philosophy of early childhood education, and teacher education. Her current research focuses on social justice, human rights, and how immigrant and international students' cultural identities intersect with the curriculum in Canadian post-secondary education settings.

Simran Kandola, Mount Royal University

Simran Kandola, BCST, is a recent graduate of the Bachelor of Child Studies degree program, Child and Youth Care Counselling, at Mount Royal University. Her interest in research increased after collaborating with her peers on a research project related to human rights and social justice in multicultural post-secondary classrooms. Simran’s has work experience in both Early Learning and Child and Youth Care community settings.

 

References

Allin, L. (2014). Collaboration between staff and students in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: The potential and the problems. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 2(1), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.2.1.95

Bovill, C., Bulley, C. J., & Morss, K. (2011). Engaging and empowering first-year students through curriculum design: Perspectives from the literature. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(2), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2010.515024

Cook-Sather, A., Abbot, S., & Silvers, H. (2016). Translating partnerships: How faculty-student collaboration in explorations of teaching and learning can transform perceptions, terms, and selves/student response. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 4(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.4.2.5

Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. Jossey-Bass.

etymonline. (n.d.). Funambulist. In etymonline. https://www.etymonline.com/word/funambulist

Fedoruk, L. M. (2022). Introduction. In L. M. Fedoruk (Ed.), Ethics and the scholarship of teaching and learning, (pp. xiii-xv). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11810-4

Felten, P. (2013). Principles of good practice in SoTL. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 121–125. https://doi.org/10.2979/teachlearninqu.1.1.121

Felten, P., & Lambert, L. M. (2020). Relationship-rich education: How human connections drive success in college. John Hopkins University Press.

Field, J., Blackman, G., & Francois, K. (2021). Teaching as authentic practice in the graduate student supervisory relationship. Imagining SoTL, 1, 77–98. https://doi.org/10.29173/isotl536

Gadamer, H. (2004). Truth and method (2nd ed.). Continuum.

Government of Canada. (2022). TCPS 2: CORE-2022 Course on Research Ethics. https://tcps2core.ca/welcome

Harvey, M., Coulson, D., Mackaway, J., & Winchester-Seeto, T. (2010). Aligning reflection in the cooperative education curriculum. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 11(3), 137–152. https://www.ijwil.org/files/APJCE_11_3_137_152.pdf

Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. The Higher Education Academy. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/engagement-through-partnership-students-partners-learning-and-teaching-higher

Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.

Lock, J., Johnson, C., Hill, L., Ostrowski, C., & Da Rosa dos Santos, L. (2021). From assistants to partners: A framework for graduate students as partners in SoTL research. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 9(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.9.2.9

Matthews, K. E., & Dollinger, M. (2023). Student voice in higher education: The importance of distinguishing student representation and student partnership. Higher Education, 85(3), 555–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00851-7

Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S. L., Matthews, K., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., Knorr, K., Marquis, E., Shammas, R., & Swaim, K. (2017). A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1) 15–37. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119

Nik Wallenda completes Niagara Falls wire walk. (2012, June 15). CBC News. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/nik-wallenda-completes-niagara-falls-wire-walk-1.1179900

Petit, P. (2016). To reach the clouds: My highwire walk between the twin towers. In P. Tait & K. Lavers (Eds.), The Routledge Circus Studies Reader (1st ed., pp. 455–460). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003074670

Richards, K. A. R., & Fletcher, T. (2020). Learning to work together: Conceptualizing doctoral supervision as a critical friendship. Sport, Education and Society, 25(1), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2018.1554561

Simmons, N., & Taylor, K. L. (2019). Leadership for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: Understanding bridges and gaps in practice. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2019.1.7995

Werder, C., Thibou, S., & Kaufer, B. (2012). Students as co-inquirers: A requisite threshold concept in educational development. Journal of Faculty Development, 26(3), 34–38.

Yeo, M., & Woolmer, C. (2022). Wrestling the monster: Novice SoTL researchers, ethics, and the dual role. In L. Fedoruk (Ed.), Ethics and the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (pp. 29–42). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11810-4

Zizka, L. (2020). Reflection and SoTL: Putting reflection (back) on faculty radar. In R. Plews & M. Amos (Eds.), Evidence-based faculty development through the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) (pp. 96–120). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2212-7

Downloads

Published

2025-12-19