Visualizing the Power and Privilege of Failure in Higher Education

Authors

  • Jennifer Ross University of Toronto
  • Pooja Dey University of Toronto Mississauga
  • Esther Baffour University of Toronto Mississauga
  • Yasmin Abdellatiff University of Toronto Mississauga
  • Emily Tjan University of Toronto Mississauga
  • Dan Guadagnolo University of Toronto Mississauga
  • Nicole Laliberte University of Toronto Mississauga
  • Fiona Rawle University of Toronto Mississauga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/isotl609

Keywords:

higher education, power, privilege, visualization, educational research, SoTL, critical race theory, feminism

Abstract

Learning from failure is a core component to education, however it is not often deliberately taught in university courses. In addition, while the rhetoric around taking risks, embracing failure, and bouncing back is pervasive in higher education, the corresponding structural supports are lacking. The purpose of the current work is to explore ways we can visualize and illustrate the power and privilege involved with embracing and learning from failure in the context of higher education. We offer three approaches to visualizing the same set of research data exploring student and instructor experiences of failure. The first figure is structured using a Venn diagram, the second uses a mobius strip, and the third draws on both puzzle imagery and the structure of a kernmantle rope to offer a more complex rendition of power and privilege in higher education. These illustrations are intended to serve as introductory guides to this topic. This work emphasizes that power is diffuse and mutable, and we underscore the critical importance of recognizing that each person will experience power and privilege differently in different circumstances. This exploration of illustrative concepts is a place to start theorizing about how students and instructors experience, resist, or wield power as they navigate academic institutions and engage with failure.  We note that each instance of struggle, failure, or recovery exhibits specific configurations of power as multiple vectors contribute more or less strongly to the situation. The exact topography of power will change as different people, areas of the institution, or social policies and values enter the equation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Jennifer Ross, University of Toronto

Jennifer N. Ross, (jennifern.ross@utoronto.ca), is the interdisciplinary postdoctoral fellow for the Failure: Learning in Progress project. Her research focuses on American literature, digital humanities, and critical theory. Previously, she served at the JHI/CLIR Postdoctoral Fellow in the Digital Humanities for the Critical Digital Humanities Initiative at the University of Toronto.

Pooja Dey, University of Toronto Mississauga

Pooja Dey is a Master of Public Health student at the Dalla Lana School of Public Health at the University of Toronto. Her research focuses on health equity, health systems, and understanding systemic factors influencing community health and wellbeing. She recently graduated with an HBSc in Comparative Physiology from the University of Toronto. 

Esther Baffour, University of Toronto Mississauga

Esther Baffour is an undergraduate researcher for the Failure: Learning in Progress project at the University of Toronto. Her interests include medicine and youth in higher education. She previously served as a student governor on the Campus Affairs Committee and is entering her final year of the Biology for Health Sciences program.

Yasmin Abdellatiff, University of Toronto Mississauga

Yasmin Abdellatiff is a fourth-year undergraduate researcher for the Failure: Learning in Progress project. She is completing a dual major in Biology for Health Sciences and Chemistry at the University of Toronto. Her interests include DNA hybridization nanotechnology and exploring the educational system in relation to students’ experiences and overall well-being.

Emily Tjan, University of Toronto Mississauga

Emily Tjan is completing her Master’s in Science of Biomedical Communication at the University of Toronto. Passionate about communicating the complexities of science, Emily hopes to evoke intrigue and inspire action through her work, including the visualizations of power and privilege in higher education. 

 

Dan Guadagnolo, University of Toronto Mississauga

Dan Guadagnolo, (daniel.guadagnolo@utoronto.ca), is an Assistant Professor, Teaching Stream, at the Institute of Communication, Culture, Information, and Technology at the University of Toronto. He is a historian of twentieth-century US business and culture, and his research examines the political economy of marketing, PR, branding, and management strategy. His current book project, Segmenting America, charts social and technological changes in consumer market segmentation and effects on North American society since WWII.

Nicole Laliberte, University of Toronto Mississauga

Nicole Laliberte, (nicole.laliberte@utoronto.ca), is an Assistant Professor, Teaching Stream, in the Department of Geography, Geomatics, and Environment at the University of Toronto. Her research interests and teaching combine geography, feminist theory, ecofeminism, and critical development studies. Her studies in systemic violence and non-violent responses include research into the intersections of militarism, development, and human rights in post-war northern Uganda, as well as violence in institutions of higher learning in North America.

Fiona Rawle, University of Toronto Mississauga

Fiona Rawle, (fiona.rawle@utoronto.ca), is a Professor, Teaching Stream, in Biology at the University of Toronto. Her research focuses on the public communication of science, combatting science misinformation, and the science of learning. Dr. Rawle is also an active member of the Toronto Initiative for Diversity and Excellence (TIDE).

References

Althusser, L. (2014). On the reproduction of late capitalism: Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. Verso.

Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2011). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. In M. A. Gernsbacher, R. W. Pew, L. M. Hough, & J. R. Pmerantz (Eds.) & FABBS Foundation, Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society (pp. 56–64). Worth Publishers.

Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.).Pearson.

D’Ignazio, C., & Klein, L. F. (2020). Data feminism. The MIT Press.

Dörk, M., Collins, C., Feng, P., & Carpendale, S. (2013). Critical InfoVis: Exploring the politics of visualization. Changing Perspectives: Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2189–2198. https://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2468739.

Duckworth, A. (2016). Grit: The power of passion and perseverance. Scribner.

Edmondson, A. C. (2011). Strategies for learning from failure. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2011/04/strategies-for-learning-from-failure.

Feigenbaum, P. (2021). Telling students it’s O.K. to fail, but showing them it isn’t: Dissonant paradigms of failure in higher education. Teaching & Learning Inquiry 9(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.9.1.3

Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality, Volume 1: An introduction. Vintage.

Hallmark, T. (2018). When “failure is OK” is not OK. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 64(23), A44.

Kapur, M. (2008). Productive failure. Cognition and Instruction 26(3), 379–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000802212669

Kapur, M. (2015). Learning from productive failure. Learning: Research and Practice, 1(1), 51–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2015.1002195

Kapur, M. (2016). Examining productive failure, productive success, unproductive failure, and unproductive success in learning. Educational Psychologist 51(2), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1155457

Kapur, M., & Kinzer, C. K. (2009). Productive failure in CSCL groups. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(1), 21–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-008-9059-z

Kordich Hall, D., & Pearson, J. (2005). Resilience—Giving children the skills to bounce back. Journal of Education and Health, 23(1), 12–15.

Kundu, A. (2014). Backtalk: Grit, overemphasized; agency, overlooked. Phi Delta Kappan, 96(1), 80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721714547870

Loo, C. M., & Rolison, G. (1986). Alienation of ethnic minority students at a predominantly White university. The Journal of Higher Education, 57(1), 58–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1986.11778749

Nixon, S. A. (2019). The coin model of privilege and critical allyship: Implications for health. BMC Public Health, 19(1637), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7884-9

Robertson, S., & Dundes, L. (2017). Anger matters: Black female student alienation at predominantly White institutions. Race and Pedagogy Journal: Teaching and Learning for Justice, 2(2). https://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/rpj/vol2/iss2/3

Verschelden, C. (2017). Bandwidth recovery: Helping students reclaim cognitive resources lost to poverty, racism, and social marginalization. Stylus.

Walker, C., Gleaves, A., & Grey, J. (2006). Can students within higher education learn to be resilient and, educationally speaking, does it matter? Educational Studies, 32(3), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690600631184

Downloads

Published

2022-12-20