Conversations and Reflections on Authentic Assessment

Authors

  • Kimberley Grant University of Calgary
  • Lisa Fedoruk University of Calgary
  • Lorelli Nowell University of Calgary

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/isotl532

Keywords:

conversation, authentic assessment, reflection

Abstract

In this paper, we describe how academic colleagues from different fields used a theoretical framework for authentic assessment as the starting point for meaningful conversations about our teaching practices. We re-envision Hutchings’ (2000) taxonomy of SoTL questions as a fluid conversational cycle rather than a system of classification. Using the eight elements of authentic assessment as outlined by Ashford-Rowe et al. (2014) as a theoretical framework, we engage with the research literature, reflect on what is and what works from our previous teaching and learning experiences, and propose ideas and questions for what is possible moving forward.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Kimberley Grant, University of Calgary

Dr. Kimberley Grant, grantka@ucalgary.ca, is an Educational Development Consultant at the Taylor Institute for Teaching and Learning and Adjunct Assistant Professor at the Werklund School of Education. She currently leads a teaching development program for academic staff and consults on program-level curriculum development and review.  

Lisa Fedoruk, University of Calgary

Dr. Lisa Fedoruk is an Educational Development Consultant at the University of Calgary. She collaborates with faculty, postdoctoral scholars and students to facilitate, guide and support workshops, programming, and resources related to the Taylor Institute’s Certificates in University Learning and Teaching and Teaching Assistant Orientation.

Lorelli Nowell, University of Calgary

Dr. Lorelli Nowell is an Assistant Professor, and she currently holds a Teaching and Learning Research Professorship. Her emerging program of research focuses on studying innovations in teaching and learning, the professional learning and development of educators, and mentorship to support teaching and learning practices.

References

Ashford-Rowe, K., Herrington, J., & Brown, C. (2014). Establishing the critical elements that determine authentic assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(2), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.819566

Archbald, D. A., & Newmann, F. M. (1988). Beyond standardized tests: Assessing authentic achievement in the secondary school. National Association of Secondary Principals.

Bass, R. (1999). The scholarship of teaching: What’s the problem? Inventio: Creative Thinking about Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 1–9. http://www.doiiit.gmu.edu/Archives/feb98/ rbass.htm

Bastable, S. B. (1997). Nurse as educator: Principles of teaching and learning. Jones and Bartlett.

Bessa, B. R., Santos, S., & Duarte, B. J. (2019). Toward effectiveness and authenticity in PBL: A proposal based on a virtual learning environment in computing education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 27(2), 452–471. https://doi.org/10.1002/ cae.22088

Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2): 151–167. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/713695728

Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (Eds.). (2013). Feedback in higher and professional education: Understanding it and doing it well. Routledge.

Bradley, P., & Postlethwaite, K. (2003). Simulation in clinical learning. Medical Education, 37(s1), 1–5.

Burrack, F. (2018). Authentic assessment. In The SAGE encyclopedia of educational research, measurement, and evaluation. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139

Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Heath.

Fook, C. Y., & Sidhu, G. K. (2010). Authentic assessment and pedagogical strategies in higher education. Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 153–161.

Gaynor, J. W. (2019). Peer review in the classroom: Student perceptions, peer feedback quality and the role of assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(5), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1697424

Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504676

Hager, P., & Hodkinson, P. (2009). Moving beyond the metaphor of transfer of learning. British Educational Research Journal, 35(4), 619–638. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 01411920802642371

Haynes, K. (2010). Critical reflections on authentic teaching: A personal account. Reflective Practice, 11(3), 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2010.487369

Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2016). Students as partners: Reflections on a conceptual model. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 4(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.20343/ teachlearninqu.4.2.3

Herodotou, C., Muirhead, D. K., Aristeidou, M., Hole, M. J., Kelley, S., Scanlon, E., & Duffy, M. (2018). Blended and online learning: A comparative study of virtual microscopy in higher education. Interactive Learning Environments 1–16. https://doi.org.10.1080/ 10494820.2018.1552874

Herrington, J. (2006, October 13–17). Authentic e-learning in higher education: Design principles for authentic learning environments and tasks [Paper presentation]. World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (ELEARN), Honolulu, HI, United Stated. http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/5247

Hutchings, P. (2000). Approaching the scholarship of teaching and learning. In P. Hutchings (Ed.), Opening lines: Approaches to the scholarship of teaching and learning (pp. 1–10). The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

Kendle, A., & Northcote, M. (2000). The struggle for balance in the use of quantitative and qualitative online assessment tasks. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. Southern Cross University Press.

Koh, K. H., Tan, C., & Ng, P. T. (2012). Creating thinking schools through authentic assessment: The case in Singapore. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 24(2), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-011-9138-y

Kolb, A., & Kolb, A. (2009). The learning way: Meta-cognitive aspects of experiential learning. Simulation and Gaming, 40(3), 297–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878108325713

Laal, M., & Ghodsi, S. M. (2012). Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 486–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091

Maxwell, T. W. (2012). Assessment in higher education in the professions: Action research as an authentic assessment task. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(6), 686–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.725220

Meer, N., & Chapman, A. (2014). Co-creation of marking criteria: Students as partners in the assessment process. Business and Management Education in HE, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.11120/bmhe.2014.00008

Nelles, L. J., Smith, C. M., Lax, L. R., & Russell, L. (2011). Translating face-to-face experiential learning to video for a web-based communication program. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2011.1.8

Newmann, F. M., Marks, H. M., & Gamoran, A. (1996). Authentic pedagogy and student performance. American Journal of Education, 104(4), 280–312.

Nicol, D. (2010). The foundation for graduate attributes: Developing self-regulation through self and peer-assessment. QAA Scotland. www.enhancementthemes.ac.uk/ resources/ publications/graduates-for-the-21st-century

Oblinger, D. G. (2004). The next generation of educational engagement. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2004(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.5334/2004-8-oblinger

Rauen, C. A. (2001). Using simulation to teach critical thinking skills: You can’t just throw the book at them. Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America, 13(1), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-5885(18)30070-4

Rivers, J., Smith, A. B., Higgins, D., Mills, R., Maier, A. B., & Howitt, S. M. (2017). Asking and answering questions: Partners, peer learning, and participation. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3072

Roxå, T., & Mårtensson, K. (2009). Significant conversations and significant networks – Exploring the backstage of the teaching arena. Studies in Higher Education, 34(5), 547–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802597200

Scharff, L., Draeger, J., Verpoorten, D., Devlin, M., Dvorakova, L. S., Lodge, J. M., & Smith, S. (2017). Exploring metacognition as support for learning transfer. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 5(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.20343/5.1.6

Villarroel, V., Bloxham, S., Bruna, D., Bruna, C., & Herrera-Seda, C. (2018). Authentic assessment: Creating a blueprint for course design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 840–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1412396

Villarroel, V., Boud, D., Bloxham, S., Bruna, D., & Bruna, C. (2020). Using principles of authentic assessment to redesign written examinations and tests. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2018.1564882

Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (2018). Formative self- and peer-assessment for improved student learning: The crucial factors of design, teacher participation and feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(7), 1032–1047. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 02602938.2018.1427698

Weaver, K., Brown, D., Bostock, J., & Kirby, J. (2020). How far does VLE self-directed study facilitate improvements in written, practical and overall assessment results? Sports therapy case study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/14703297.2020.1722201

Wiggins, G. P. (1990). The case for authentic assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2(2), 1–3.

Wiggins, G. P. (1993). Assessing student performance: Exploring the purpose and limits of testing. Jossey-Bass.

Yates, T., Wilson, J., & Purton, K. (2015). Surveying assessment in experiential learning: A single campus study. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(3), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2015.3.4

Zhang, L., & Zheng, Y. (2018). Feedback as an assessment for learning tool: How useful can it be? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(7), 1120–1132. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1434481

Zizka, L. (2020). Reflection and SoTL: Putting reflection (back) on faculty radar. In R. C. Plews & M. L. Amos (Eds.), Evidence-based faculty development through the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) (pp. 96–120). IGI Global.

Downloads

Published

2021-03-15

Issue

Section

Articles