Teaching as Authentic Practice in the Graduate Student Supervisory Relationship
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/isotl536Keywords:
Student experience, supervision, mentoring, authentic practiceAbstract
This article is the outcome of a co-inquiry with students where shared interests about student learning, students as partners, and a hermeneutic lens shaped the main research questions: What are graduate students’ experiences of the supervisory relationship and what happens inside the relationship in terms of learning and student success? We conducted 16 in-depth interviews with graduate students across various departments and programs. From these interviews we theorized that it may be more appropriate to speak of graduate supervision as a practice which produces internal and external goods. We found that it may be more appropriate to speak of the pedagogy as mentoring. We believe our research findings extend understanding of the supervisory relationship, contribute to the concept of teaching, and expand the idea of partnership with students in higher education wherever faculty and students find themselves in supervisory relationships. This is relevant to SoTL because it allowed us to think of the nuances in the word teaching and how supervisory relationships in higher education may need to expand the way we talk about teaching and learning in higher education.
Downloads
References
Agné, H., & Mörkenstam, U. (2018). Should first-year doctoral students be supervised collectively or individually? Effects on thesis completion and time to completion. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(4), 669–682. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1453785
Åkerlind, G., & McAlpine, L. (2017). Supervising doctoral students: Variation in purpose and pedagogy. Studies in Higher Education, 42(9), 1686–1698. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1118031
Boucher, C., & Smyth, A. (2004). Up close and personal: Reflections on our experience of supervising research candidates who are using personal reflective techniques. Reflective Practice, 5(3), 345–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/1462394042000270664
Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. Jossey-Bass.
Cook-Sather, A., Matthews, K. E., Ntem, A., & Leathwick, S. (2018). What we talk about when we talk about students as partners. International Journal for Students as Partners, 2(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i2.3790
Delany, D. (2009). A review of the literature on effective PhD supervision. Trinity College Dublin. https://www.tcd.ie/CAPSL/assets/pdf/Academic%20Practice%20Resources/ Effective_Supervision_Literature_Review.pdf
Dericks, G., Thompson, E., Roberts, M., & Phua, F. (2019). Determinants of PhD student satisfaction: The roles of supervisor, department, and peer qualities. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(7), 1053–1068. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1570484
Ellis, M. (2001). Harmful supervision, a cause for alarm: Comment on Gray et al. (2001) and Nelson and Friedlander (2001), Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48(4), 401–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.48.4.401
Felten, P. (2013). Principles of good practice in SoTL. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 121–
125. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.1.121
Glaser, R. D., & Thorpe, J. S. (1986). Unethical intimacy: A survey of sexual contact and advances between psychology educators and female graduate students. American Psychologist, 41(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.41.1.43
González-Ocampo, G., & Castelló, M. (2019). How do doctoral students experience supervision? Studies in Continuing Education, 41(3), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037x2018.1520208
Goodyear, R. K., Crego, C. A., & Johnston, M. W. (1992). Ethical issues in the supervision of student research: A study of critical incidents. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 23(3), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.23.3.203
Halse, C. (2011). ‘Becoming a supervisor’: The impact of doctoral supervision on supervisors’ learning. Studies in Higher Education, 36(5), 557–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.594593
Hancock, J., & Lubicz-Nawrocka, T. (2018). Creating spaces: Embracing risk and partnership in higher education. Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 1(24).
Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. The Higher Education Academy. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/resources/engagement_through_partnership.pdf
Horsfall, D. (2008). Bearing witness: Toward a pedagogical practice of love? Reflective Practice, 9(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940701816618
Jacobs, C. (1991). Violations of the supervisory relationship: An ethical and educational blind spot. Social Work, 36(2), 130–135. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/36.2.130
Johnson, L., Lee, A., & Green, B. (2000). The PhD and the autonomous self: Gender, rationality and postgraduate pedagogy. Studies in Higher Education, 25(2), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/713696141
Kreber, C. (2013). Authenticity in and through teaching in higher education: The transformative potential of the scholarship of teaching. Routledge.
Kreber, C. (2015). Furthering the “theory debate” in the scholarship of teaching: A proposal based on Macintyre’s account of practices. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 45(2), 99–115.
Lechuga, V. M. (2011). Faculty-graduate student mentoring relationships: Mentors’ perceived roles and responsibilities. Higher Education, 62(6), 757–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9416-0
Lee, A. (2008). How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802049202
Lunsford, L. (2012). Doctoral advising or mentoring? Effects on student outcomes. Mentorship Tutoring Partnership and Learning, 20(2), 251–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2012.678974
Manathunga, C. (2012). Supervisors watching supervisors: The deconstructive possibilities and tensions of team supervision. The Australian Universities’ Review, 54(1), 29–37.
Mansson, D. H., & Myers, S. A. (2012). Using mentoring enactment theory to explore the doctoral student-advisor mentoring relationship. Communication Education, 61(4), 309–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2012.708424
McCallin, A., & Nayar, S. (2012). Postgraduate research supervision: A critical review of current practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(1), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2011.590979
Moules, N. J., McCaffrey, G., Field, J. C., & Laing, C. M. (2015). Conducting hermeneutic research: From philosophy to practice. Peter Lang.
Omar, F., Mahone, J. P., Ngobia, J., & FitzSimons, J. (2016). Building rapport between international graduate students and their faculty advisors: Cross-cultural mentoring relationships at the University of Guelph. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 7(2), 2–17. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2016.2.8
Paglis, L. L., Green, S. G., & Bauer, T. N. (2006). Does adviser mentoring add value? A longitudinal study of mentoring and doctoral student outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 47(4), 451–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-9003-2
Poole, G. (2018). Using intuition, anecdote, and observation: Rich sources of SoTL projects. In N. L. Chick (Ed.), SoTL in action: Illuminating critical moments of practice (pp. 7–14). Stylus.
Richards, K. A. R., & Fletcher, T. (2020). Learning to work together: Conceptualizing doctoral supervision as a critical friendship. Sport, Education and Society, 25(1), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2018.1554561
Roach, A., Christensen, B. K., Rieger, E., & Graham, S. (2019). The essential ingredients of research supervision: A discrete-choice experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(7), 1243–1260. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000322
Rugg, G., & Petre, M. (2004). The unwritten rules of PhD research. Open University Press.
Sarikaya, E. E., McAlpine, L., & Amundsen, C. (2017). Doctoral students’ experiences of feeling (or not) like an academic. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 12, 73–90. https://doi.org/10.28945/3727
Sullivan, L. E., & Ogloff, J. R. P. (1998). Appropriate supervisor-graduate student relationships. Ethics & Behavior, 8(3), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327019eb0803_4
Sverdlik, A., Hall, N. C., McAlpine, L., & Hubbard, K. (2018). The PhD experience: A review
of the factors influencing doctoral students’ completion, achievement, and well-being. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 361–388. https://doi.org/10.28945/4113
University of Calgary. (2018). Checklist of expectations for graduate students and supervisors. https://grad.ucalgary.ca/sites/default/files/teams/3/su_student-supervisor-checklist.pdf
Waghid, Y. (2006). Reclaiming freedom and friendship through postgraduate student supervision. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(4), 427–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600874185
Watts, J. H. (2008). Challenges of supervising part-time PhD students: Towards student-centred practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(3), 369–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510802045402
Welikala, T., & Atkin, C. (2014). Student co-inquirers: The challenges and benefits of inclusive research. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 37(4), 390–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2014.909402
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Dr James Field, Galicia Blackman, Kaitlyn Francois
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
