Looking for High Quality Research Evidence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/jafn811Keywords:
research, research evidenceAbstract
Forensic nursing requires an understanding of the quality of research supporting practice and testimony. In this review article the levels of research quality are reviewed along with where to easily find the highest levels of research on a topic. Factors affecting quality are also discussed.
References
American Psychiatric Association-APA. (2019). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). American Psychological Association.
Berkman, N. D., Lohr, K. N., Ansari, M. T., Balk, E. M., Kane, R., McDonagh, M., Morton, S. C., Viswanathan, M., Bass, E. B., Butler, M., Gartlehner, G., Hartling, L., McPheeters, M., Morgan, L. C., Reston, J., Sista, P., Whitlock, E., & Chang, S. (2015). Grading the strength of a body of evidence when assessing health care interventions: an EPC update. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 68(11), 1312-1324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.023
Brunt, B. A., & Morris, M. M. (2023). Nursing professional development Evidence-based practice. StatPearls. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK589676/
Burns, P. B., Rohrich, R. J., & Chung, K. C. (2011). The levels of evidence and their role in evidence-based medicine. Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 128(1), 305-310. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318219c171
Carter-Snell, C. J., & Singh, S. (2024). Trustworthiness of research results: Significant or Not? Journal of the Academy of Forensic Nursing-JAFN, 1(2), 48–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29173/jafn731 (December 2023)
Coughlan, M., Cronin, P., & Ryan, F. (2007). Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 1: quantitative research. British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing), 16(11), 658-663. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2007.16.11.23681
DiCenso, A., Bayley, L., & Haynes, R. B. (2009). Accessing pre-appraised evidence: Fine tuning the 5S model into a 6S model. Evidence-Based Nursing, 12(4), 99-101. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebn.12.4.99-b
Ebell, M. H., Siwek, J., Weiss, B. D., Woolf, S. H., Susman, J., Ewigman, B., & Bowman, M. (2004). Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT): A Patient-Centered Approach to Grading Evidence in the Medical Literature. Americal Journal of Medical Genetics (Neuropsychiatric Genetics), 69(3), 548-556. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.17.1.59
Heinrich, D. S., & O'Connell, K. A. (2024). The Effects of Mindfulness Meditation on Nursing Students' Stress and Anxiety Levels [Article]. Nursing Education Perspectives (Wolters Kluwer Health), 45(1), 31-36. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001159
Lourenço Correa, C. (2022). How to survive in the academic jungle? Protection strategies against predatory journals. Fisioterapia em Movimento, 35, 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1590/fm.2022.35001
Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2015). Evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare: A guide to best practice. Wolters Kluwer.
Nair, A. S. (2019). Publication bias-importance of studies with negative results! [Letter to editor]. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, 63(6), 505-507. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6573059/pdf/IJA-63-505.pdf
Ryan, F., Coughlan, M., & Cronin, P. (2007). Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 2: Qualitative research. British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing), 16(12), 738-744. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2007.16.12.23726
Woo, K. (2019). Polit & Beck Canadian Essentials of Nursing Research. Wolters Kluwer.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Catherine Carter-Snell
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.