Follow us on:
Submissions
Publication Process for Undergraduates and Behavioural Sciences
Includes advice, guidelines, checklists, and information on the publication process; is peer-reviewed.Fluid Publication 2022
Accepting manuscripts on any topic in the behaviour sciences!
See Submission Guidelines for submission criteria at: https://mrujs.mtroyal.ca/index.php/bsuj/about/submissions
Art, Graphics, & Media Submissions
Submission portal for cover art, banner art, and other non-manuscript submissions to the BSUJ.
See Submission Guidelines for submission criteria at: https://mrujs.mtroyal.ca/index.php/bsuj/about/submissions
Intersectionality and Healthcare (Special Edition)
See Submission Guidelines for submission criteria at: https://mrujs.mtroyal.ca/index.php/bsuj/about/submissions
INTERSECTIONALITY AND HEALTHCARE (BSUJ SPECIAL EDITION)
Centring the experiences of Black women, Kimberlé Crenshaw (1989) coined the term “intersectionality” to highlight how various identity-related factors (i.e., racialization, gender identity and expression, sexual identity and expression, disability, status of impoverishment, etc.) each contain barriers created and sustained by social, political, economic (and other) systems of power.
Crenshaw (1989) emphasizes that overlapping identity factors (with a critical focus on the experiences of Black women) are thus accompanied by overlapping barriers, which influence a person or community’s life experiences, access to care, and overall well-being.
This framework can be extended to virtually all areas of Westernized healthcare, as identity factor-related barriers (i.e., medical racism, medical transphobia, cishetsexism, etc.) are overwhelmingly and consistently present.
Examples of Relevant Topics
- Disproportionate access to mental healthcare
- Supervised consumption sites as critical infrastructure
- Inaccessibility of trans and intersex-informed care
- Gender affirmation as healthcare and suicide prevention
- Colonial violence and associated healthcare barriers
- Ageism in healthcare
- Racial bias in medical testing and treatment
- Gatekeeping in sciences and medical fields
- Access to trauma-informed care
- Intersectional education for prospective medical professionals
- Representation in healthcare
- Access to interpreters and translators
- Alternatives to law enforceament in wellness checks
- Public housing as healthcare
- Racialization of drug policy
- Accessible public washrooms as healthcare
- Affordable childcare as healthcare
- Access to comprehensive healthcare benefits
- Paid leave for health and mental health-related illness
- Easily-accessible food security as healthcare
- Costs of pharmaceuticals and treatments
- Personal experiences and challenges within the healthcare system
- Decriminalization of sex work and sex workers as healthcare
- Access to regulated (untampered and consistently-dosed) drugs
- Harm-reduction approaches
- Distributions of COVID-19 vaccines
- Disproportionate impact by COVID-19 policy and financial subsistence
- Chronic pain stigmatization
- Access to assistive technologies and equipment
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 8, 138-167. (no DOI found). https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8
This call was written by Shayla-Rose Somers, who is a white, disabled, queer, non-binary, neurodivergent person, and journal editor for the BSUJ.
Copyright Notice
Note: The author is prepared to hold their copyright under Creative Commons, meaning the author retains copyright and agrees to open sharing of their manuscript for educational purposes. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before, during, or after the publication process with BSUJ, as it can lead to productive exchanges, reviews, and citations of published work.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Privacy Statement
The data collected from registered and non-registered users of this journal falls within the scope of the standard functioning of peer-reviewed journals. It includes information that makes communication possible for the editorial process; it is used to inform readers about the authorship and editing of content; it enables collecting aggregated data on readership behaviours, as well as tracking geopolitical and social elements of scholarly communication.
This journal’s editorial team and its hosting partners, the University of Alberta Libraries and Mount Royal University Library, use this data to guide their work in publishing and improving this journal. Data that will assist in developing this publishing platform may be shared with its developer Public Knowledge Project in an anonymized and aggregated form, with appropriate exceptions such as article metrics. The data will not be sold by this journal, the University of Alberta Libraries, or PKP nor will it be used for purposes other than those stated here. The authors published in this journal are responsible for the human subject data included in the research reported here.
This website uses Google Analytics, a service which transmits website traffic data to Google servers in the United States. Google Analytics does not identify individual users or associate your IP address with any other data held by Google. This journal uses reports provided by Google Analytics to help it understand website traffic and webpage usage, and report on such usage to funding agencies, association members, and other agencies. You can opt out of Google Analytics by installing this browser add-on.
Those involved in editing this journal seek to be compliant with industry standards for data privacy, including the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) provision for “data subject rights” that include (a) breach notification; (b) right of access; (c) the right to be forgotten; (d) data portability; and (e) privacy by design. The GDPR also allows for the recognition of “the public interest in the availability of the data,” which has a particular saliency for those involved in maintaining, with the greatest integrity possible, the public record of scholarly publishing.